|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||
|
Moderator
|
Often criticized for his hair, this ref has shown a clear bias and arrogance toward the Leafs during his entire reign as a ref in this league. Anybody who can look objectively at his calls can see this.
I'd rather not relive the most famous Fraser / Leaf incident of the 1993 playoffs. Even Fraser himself admitted he f-ed up that call. The admission came many years too late. And here we are again. Another Leaf season possibly decided by a single Fraser oversight. Even after his admission of the '93 F-up. Well, at least he's consistent: consistently bad, that is. Canada.com Quote:
Fraser's explaination: Quote:
WTF??? This ass is talking out of both sides of his mouth. First he says the goal can't count because DiPietro was prevented from getting up. In other words, the goaltender was interfered with. But then he says he doesn't "believe it's worthy of a penalty." So much for being clearly written in the rulebook, eh Kerry?? Which rulebook is this ass reading, anyways?? GT interference is definitely written clearly in that book. If he felt DiPietro was interfered with, that should have been the call, along with the goal disallowed. But no. Let's apply Fraser's Leaf bias to it. "Well, it's not a penalty, IMO, but the goal can't count because the Leafs might win.... I mean... because DiPietro was interfered with. The rule is clear on this." And which one is the reason for DiPietro not being able to make the save? Poni's stick or Antropov in the crease? He seems to be pointing to both things, yet neither are worthy of a penalty. Just the possible game-sealing goal dissallowed. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So calm; so cool; and nothing was going to get him to review the play. He felt he was right, and there was nothing going to get him to reconsider. After all, he's Kerry Fraser. He never makes a mistake. Right???
__________________
FloydianLeaf / Leaf_Fan_4_Ever 1969 - 2007 R.I.P. Michael. Shine on, you crazy diamond. |
|||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|