09-21-2007, 07:44 AM
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,358
 |
So are your rankings based on potential or performance. In the first game, they were tied with a mediocre Saints team at halftime and then struggled to beat the Titans.
You didn't give credit to the Titans because you said the Colts played poorly. It just seems odd you are ranking a team that has played poorly for 75% of the season to be ranked the second best team in the league. |
|
|
|
09-21-2007, 08:40 AM
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MD, on the Potomac River
Posts: 5,390
  |
As with any ranking... it is a bit of both... if it were pure performance of the first 2 games, it would be much different... and if it were pure subjective speculation of the future, it would also be very different
and in response to your point... even if the Colts play poorly... them playing poorly is still better than most teams playing good in relation to their talent levels, coaching, and gameplans
__________________
Reagan in 08... Even though he's dead, he's the better choice! Superdelegates - Because even the Democratic party knows it's base is too stupid to make really important decisions. |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.fanhome.com/forums/national-football-league/10088-dds-power-rankings-pre-week-3-a.html
|
|||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date |
| nfl power rankings: Blogs, Photos, Videos and more on Technorati | This thread | Refback | 09-18-2007 11:35 AM |
