|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Hall of Famer
|
UJC - Israel Baseball League to Open This Summer
Quote:
I personally don't like the rule for the tie-breaker, but can understand why the potentially infinite length of a game might deter fans in nations without the history of baseball. A seven inning game though should help keep games at two-ish hours or less.
__________________
I'm sorry I left for a while. I needed a vaction, and then work changed substantially. I'm over 50 hour weeks, plus two hours a day of commuting time. A few weeks ago I launched my own blog about Seattle Sounders FC and Life in Puget Sound. I won't be by these parts often as my focus has changed. Sorry about the unannounced retirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 760
|
Home run derby... I can see the appeal from a non-traditional standpoint, but would explode in open revolt were any such rule enacted over here. There is, after all, a reason why only so many fans show up for batting practice, and glorifying it doesn't change a thing
*shudder* |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 670
|
this rule the HR derby one i don't like at all. it is true most fans will probaly love to see that but its not fair to the teams because this saying means you must have a big bat in your line up so you can't just win a game on pitching and deffense now which is why i think this rule is not fair to all teams but hey we will soon find out
__________________
METS 07 WS CHAMPS i like how that just rolls of the tongue cant wait until that comes true |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 50
|
The simple truth is that it's not necessary. Extra inning games just don't often go more than a few innings, and when they do it's kind of treated as a wonderful and unusual event.
Games that have had different sorts of tiebreaker systems, such as the shootout process in soccer, generally have them because they need them. Soccer has a LOT of tie games, and a game can remain tied for a very long time, so in a playoff situation where a decision must be reached a shootout at least is a useful option. Baseball, on the other hand, 1. Doesn't actually have that many games ending in regulation ties - teams will generally average about six to ten percent of games going into extra innings, and 2. Generally resolves tie games fairly quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
|
I think this rule could only work in a non-traditional setting, such as Israel. But that doesn't mean the rule should ever be tried somewhere else.
__________________
I'm sorry I left for a while. I needed a vaction, and then work changed substantially. I'm over 50 hour weeks, plus two hours a day of commuting time. A few weeks ago I launched my own blog about Seattle Sounders FC and Life in Puget Sound. I won't be by these parts often as my focus has changed. Sorry about the unannounced retirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 60
|
I could see it being used in games that "don't matter". e.g. spring training games, all-star games, etc. A lot of exhibition games have time limits, and this would be a way that fans could go home having seen a winner.
Otherwise, I'd never want to see this for a game that counted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
Quite frankly, I am like an extra innings magnet, as almost every game (roughly 80%) I have gone to since I was living in Milwaukee over 8 years ago....Detroit-Cleveland went like 13 innings it was like a 18-16 game or something like that with fireworks afterwards at like 1am haha....then the Florida-New York World Series Game 4 (Roger Clemens last game supposedly), Brewers-Marlins twice two years ago....Brewers-Reds where Koskie got hurt last year....and there isn't anything better than getting extra innings..especially if you can only make it every once and awhile...
__________________
BMW Green Bay Packers 14-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Hall of Famer
|
Al Jazeera English - Sport - Israel Launches Pro Baseball League
The league has opened play Quote:
__________________
I'm sorry I left for a while. I needed a vaction, and then work changed substantially. I'm over 50 hour weeks, plus two hours a day of commuting time. A few weeks ago I launched my own blog about Seattle Sounders FC and Life in Puget Sound. I won't be by these parts often as my focus has changed. Sorry about the unannounced retirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,579
|
It's good to see that sports may be the ultimate way to some kind of sanity in the Middle East.
I'm an old-timer, but I'm not at all averse to game innovations, especially if they keep the game moving along. I don't like the home run derby idea, either, because it negates a full game effort of at least 18 players and should not end on a one shot. I've toyed with a few ideas over the years that might get the game moving; and I don't believe I've ever expressed them, but here goes, FWIW: 1. Except for injury or broken equipment, or some such legitimate interruptive incident, a pitcher should have a set time limit between pitches to the plate, say 25 seconds; 2. So #1 does not intrude on stolen base strategies, I would apply that rule to deliveries to the plate or to whatever base a pick-off attempt is made; 3. A batter, for other than injury or foreign matter distraction, gnat swarm, sand in eye, etc. may step out of the box no more than once in any plate appearance; for those, he may ask for time [with cause] and get umpire concurrence; 4. A pitcher-catcher battery may conference only once per inning, except when some extraordinary event interrupts game progress; that will make being on the same page regarding signs imperative to both parties, or else; 5. Any fight, altercation, bench-clearing melee will result in not less than a $1,000 fine for any player leaving his position, coaching box, bullpen or dugout - automatically, with second or third, etc. offenses incremental by $1,000 each incident over a single season; 6. A manager or coach representing a manager may question 2 calls in a game, but never on balls and strikes; and the umps shall carry a stop watch that times them the second they start to approach to make their case ... at 45 seconds - it's over, or you're gone; 7. To cut down on these "beefs," MLB will institute an instant-replay camera for very close plays; and IF the camera makes a clear call, THAT call will stand; this will NOT apply to balls and strikes; 8. I know that radio and TV ads raise the revenue; but if there were a time limit of 90 seconds between the last out for one team in a half-inning and the first pitch to the first batter in the next half-inning, or extend it to 100 seconds, that's at least 4 20 second ads [or mix 'em up howevr you like]; then too, there's pre-game, post game, etc. EXCEPTION: 7th inning stretch preserved. I'd stick with 9 innings. When I was a kid, heck, even a young man, I'd see games at 1:27 meaning one hour, twenty-seven minutes occasionally; and 1:37 or 1:44 were not at all uncommon. If extra innings are a real concern, I'd try something that forces managers and pitching coaches to manage their staffs professionally, perhaps even modifying the role of a closer. Example: Any pitcher officially on the mound at the start of the 9th inning will pitch not less than 2 innings; and in any event, neither team may employ more than 2 pitchers in extra innings. Sounds nasty; but these guys make big bucks and should be able to hack a few innings now and again. Just thinking out loud. Last edited by nanwynnfan; June 28th, 2007 at 10:43 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|