Buccaneers or Seahawks?

JoseA · December 16th, 2007, 04:38 PM

Assuming both teams win their first round wild card matchup who would you rather see come into Lambeau and face the Packers in the 2nd round?

I would rather see the Buccaneers because I don't want to see Holmgren return to Lambeau, basically that's why. Plus the Bucs are probably less used to the cold weather, so that is my reasoning.

bedir than average · December 16th, 2007, 04:43 PM

"We want the ball and we're going to score," Matt Hasselbeck.

I want to see that story brought back up.

JoseA · December 17th, 2007, 11:32 AM

Yeah, that was some hilarious stuff by Hasselbeck! Maybe Seattle wouldn't be the worst team to play. After all their run game has been horrible lately and Shaun Alexander isn't the same as he used to be. But even with that said I still see the Seahawks as a very dangerous team.

BMW · January 3rd, 2008, 11:19 AM

Neither team concerns me, as I dont think they can score on our Defense. I do think Tampa would give us more problems with their Cover 2 scheme, and our short passing game.

diceman · January 7th, 2008, 12:54 PM

Now that the first weekend of playoffs is over, I'm picking the Seahawks!

The 'Hawks shouldn't be a problem unless the Pack is flat from the week off. I just hope Woodson is near the top of his game.

December 16th, 2007, 04:38 PM	#1 (permalink)
JoseA Moderator Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: USA Posts: 2,097	Buccaneers or Seahawks? Assuming both teams win their first round wild card matchup who would you rather see come into Lambeau and face the Packers in the 2nd round? I would rather see the Buccaneers because I don't want to see Holmgren return to Lambeau, basically that's why. Plus the Bucs are probably less used to the cold weather, so that is my reasoning. __________________ Register here and join the discussion

December 16th, 2007, 04:43 PM	#2 (permalink)
bedir than average Hall of Famer Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Starbucks Posts: 8,258	"We want the ball and we're going to score," Matt Hasselbeck. I want to see that story brought back up. __________________ I'm sorry I left for a while. I needed a vaction, and then work changed substantially. I'm over 50 hour weeks, plus two hours a day of commuting time. A few weeks ago I launched my own blog about Seattle Sounders FC and Life in Puget Sound. I won't be by these parts often as my focus has changed. Sorry about the unannounced retirement.

December 17th, 2007, 11:32 AM	#3 (permalink)
JoseA Moderator Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: USA Posts: 2,097	Yeah, that was some hilarious stuff by Hasselbeck! Maybe Seattle wouldn't be the worst team to play. After all their run game has been horrible lately and Shaun Alexander isn't the same as he used to be. But even with that said I still see the Seahawks as a very dangerous team. __________________ Register here and join the discussion

January 3rd, 2008, 11:19 AM	#4 (permalink)
BMW Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Cape Coral Florida Posts: 830	Neither team concerns me, as I dont think they can score on our Defense. I do think Tampa would give us more problems with their Cover 2 scheme, and our short passing game. __________________ BMW Green Bay Packers 14-4

January 7th, 2008, 12:54 PM	#5 (permalink)
diceman Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Port Orange, Florida Posts: 1,328	Now that the first weekend of playoffs is over, I'm picking the Seahawks! The 'Hawks shouldn't be a problem unless the Pack is flat from the week off. I just hope Woodson is near the top of his game. __________________ From "Bull Durham": Skip: You guys. You lollygag the ball around the infield. You lollygag your way down to first. You lollygag in and out of the dugout. You know what that makes you? Larry! Larry: Lollygaggers! Skip: Lollygaggers.