|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 2,309
|
These are in addition to several already noted...
Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey in Under Siege. Steven Berkoff as Victor Maitland and Jonathon Banks as his right hand man "Zack" in Beverly Hills Cop Tony Perkins in Les Miserables Gary Busey in Lethal Weapon. Jack Nicholson in a "Few Good Men" Bob Gunton as Warden Samuel Norton in Shawshank Redemption James Remar as Albert Ganz in 48 Hours Louise Fletcher as Nurse Ratched in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest Arnie as the Terminator Bette Davis as Baby Jane Hudson in "Whatever Happened to Baby Jane" Kevin Spacey as Verbal Kint is Usual Suspects |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa Bay area, Florida
Posts: 2,510
|
Quote:
And guys, lets not just name every bad guy out there. I mean REALLY discuss why these villians are great. Tommy Lee Jones character is a caricature, I wouldn't have listed him. Bad movie, weak role. Ed Norton's character in the Italian Job isn't as good as the guy he played in "Primal Fear" that earned him an Oscar nom... Rick Moranis' character is the antagonist but hardly villainous. Again, a caricature... Seriously, lets DISCUSS these villians -- not just name every bad guy on the planet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 779
|
From Dictionary.com:
Antagonist - the adversary of the hero or protagonist of a drama or other literary work. Villain - a dramatic or fictional character who is typically at odds with the hero. Sorry. Thank you for making me hate message boards even more.
__________________
Oh, whatever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa Bay area, Florida
Posts: 2,510
|
Why? Because you see no conflict or difference between the two?
If you are going to use the post by me as a reason to hate message boards even more -- that's an incredibly weak reasoning. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,579
|
Just watched "Sleeping with the Enemy" [1991] last night, in which Julia Roberts fakes her own death to escape her obsessive-compulsive, abusive and insane husband.
Patrick Bergin was very effective in that role. Last edited by nanwynnfan; February 7th, 2007 at 02:58 PM. Reason: spelling error typo |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 779
|
Well, I'm interested in why you think there is a distinction between an antagonist and a villain.
But so anyway, then, I'll explain why I think that Dark Helmet was a good villain. By another definition of the word villain ("a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime" is another one that should work fine), Dark Helmet fits perfectly. Dark Helmet is cruelly malicious (he willingly does the bidding of Planet Spaceball's President Scroob by putting together an kidnapping-extortion plot that will result in the Planet Druidia being without air and thus killing its inhabitants), and he is devoted to wickedness and crime (Helmet is near the top of the movie's Imperious Forces, a fairly "wicked" organization by any standard). His actions throughout the movie pretty much define a villain. Just because the movie is a comedy (even a totally ridiculous one like Spaceballs) doesn't mean you can't have strong villains. In fact, I think comedic villains can make stronger villains, because they're likeable in a way that flat-out evil villains aren't. I don't know, I don't want to get too hoity-toity about Spaceballs or anything. Anyway, some other examples come to mind (Vizzinni the Sicilian in the Princess Bride, Robert Goulet as Quentin Hapsburg in the Naked Gun 2 1/2) that kind of prove this. To me anyway. I said this kind of thing makes me hate message boards because I always think "hey that's interesting, I'll throw my two cents in," and usually without fail someone swoops down to tell me I'm wrong. I know we're talking about opinion here, but whatever.
__________________
Oh, whatever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa Bay area, Florida
Posts: 2,510
|
Quote:
Yet are these guys villains in the movies? Are they arch villains that trump all other bad guys in a movie? Absolutely not. If this is the case, how many "VILLAINS" would be listed by the logic of just saying an antagonist is a villain? Suffice it to say, this thread has turned into a dump for movie villains, it isn't a discussion of favorite movie villains, it's simply "Mention any guy think is bad in the movies!" If you want to harp on THAT for a reason why you hate message boards -- you'd have my applause. But no, you hate message boards because someone called into question the difference between an Antagonist and a Villain... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
That made absolutely no sense. So since he's been playing bad guys since he was a kid, a movie he did in '93 wouldn't count as an earlier role? And guys, lets not just name every bad guy out there. I mean REALLY discuss why these villians are great. Tommy Lee Jones character is a caricature, I wouldn't have listed him. Bad movie, weak role. And the fact you wouldn't have listed him is your prerogative. Even in bad movies people can play good villains (Jim Carrey as the Riddler, as an example) Ed Norton's character in the Italian Job isn't as good as the guy he played in "Primal Fear" that earned him an Oscar nom... Seeming a bit like you're trying to impose your will here. If you think he wasn't as good in one movie as another then you're entitled to that opinion but you're making it seem like someone else is totally wrong for expressing their opinion Seriously, lets DISCUSS these villians -- not just name every bad guy on the planet.[/quote] I have no problem with this at all, just hate when a thread that was started to generate some friendly banter is reduced to entirely too much psychoanalysis Last edited by TheDreadedFoosa; February 8th, 2007 at 06:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Famer
|
You actually thought Jim Carey as the Riddler was a good performance in a good role??
It was absolutely HORRID. One of the main reasons the movie stunk to high heaven. As a matter of fact, after Jack played the Joker, every villain in the Batman series has pretty much STUNK. Jack blended the cartoonish stuff with the dark side in a masterful performance. With Carey, if I never again see him throwing little bombs in the batcave to little fart sounds and gestures, I will die a happy man.
__________________
Reagan in 08... Even though he's dead, he's the better choice! Superdelegates - Because even the Democratic party knows it's base is too stupid to make really important decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 155
|
The movie itself was putrid, maybe I'm just biased towards Carrey, I've liked in him in most everything I've seen him in, except of course Ace Ventura 2. I thought his Riddler was an entertaining, but certainly not academy award winning performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | ||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Oh, whatever. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|