|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 118
|
Are you kidding me?.....this is the exact type of signing in "this wild market" that is really GOOD.
The $3.5 million isn't really a factor. Sure its a bit high, but when faced with the alternative (Mesa)....I have no problem with it. The point we should be focusing in is the ONE YEAR DEAL. In this market, with most relievers getting 2-3 year contracts (thanks Baltimore), we're not on the hook for Hawkins if he doesn't prove his worth this season. My guess is that we could have gotten him for as little as $2.5 per year if we signed him to a 2-year contract. I'd rather pay MORE and only be committed to him for one season. O'Dowd has been trying to get this guy for years. Its about time to see if he can handle Coors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
I highly doubt it was Rivera that played in the Pioneer League back in 95. Rather it was someone with a similar name that showed up in his profile. The Cube is a great resource.....just remember their still ironing out a few kinks. Be sure to notify them when you see errors like this. Quote:
I LOVED that we signed him away from the Dodgers based SOLELY on Castilla basically saying "no, no....sign with the Rockies and NOT the Dodgers....trust me.....I'm a Mexican Baseball Legend" Anytime we can beat the Dodgers to a kid........anywhere......I consider that a huge win. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 902
|
Quote:
Re: Hawkins... I don't like the $3.5 million. I do like the one year. It may be best for us to simply accept that the only really good offseason acquisitions are going to be the scrap heap finds like Rivera, and that any money spent on the free agent market will yield mediocre returns at best. As I said in another thread, I would have liked to see us make a run at Julio Lugo, but even if we did, the odds of Lugo actually choosing the Rockies would have been slim. In other words, we might as well spend our extra money somehow. And Hawkins isn't a bad gamble at all.I wouldn't. Hawkins projects at 3.71 (incidentally, Danys Baez projects at 3.70 - which makes the Orioles look even dumber than you might have thought). Mesa is replacement level. Last edited by Heltonfan; December 1st, 2006 at 10:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,082
|
Well, the Hawkins signing is exactly the type of acquisition that has been an O'Dowd strength since he has been GM. His ability to cobble together cheap and relatively effective bullpens has superceded his abilities in most other areas other than in dumping salaries. I look at this Hawkins signing as analagous to the Todd Jones signing a few years ago. That worked out well for us (for one year, anyway).
Hawkins is a value play due to the short length of contractual commitment. While $3.5 million is an inflated amount, it's only for a year and is really a bargain relative to some of the other crazy relief pitcher signings this offseason. If we get the 2002-04 Hawkins, we should be happy. If we get the 2005-06 Hawkins, he will remind us of Jose Mesa, in a bad way. Since he's 34, and coming off a challenging year with groin and personal issues, maybe he's due for a comeback of sorts toward his form from earlier this decade. Let's hope so. Last edited by Roxpert; December 1st, 2006 at 09:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: aurora
Posts: 183
|
"In this market, with most relievers getting 2-3 year contracts (thanks Baltimore)"
As both sg and HF have pointed out, I'm astonished by the Baltimore signings. I can see that they would need to overpay to get a player to sign with a bad franchise (thanks Peter Angelos) but their signings are starting to throw this entire off-season into an exercise to see who can pay the most for the least amount of talent. LaTroy Hawkins? $3.5M? If he was anything other than a stopgap at this point in his career, he would've stayed with one team for at least the last couple of years. Instead he's bounced around. There can be acceptable scrapheap signings, and then there can be Ray King revisited. Except this time, continuing lack of ability might have been verified by more than one team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 118
|
The only key sidenote to the Hawkins signing is that he is a Type B free agent. Which means that we'll be giving Baltimore our 2nd round pick in next year's draft.
I'm not completely opposed to this consider our track record with 2nd round picks, however it should be at least noted. I don't think we could have waited until after the arbitration deadline and still gotten a quality arm in this market. It should be thought of as $3.5 million and a 2nd round pick. We just need to root for someone to sign Jose Mesa in the next week or two so we can get a 2nd rounder back (Mesa is a Type B free agent) |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Posts: 902
|
Under the new collective bargaining agreement, Type B free agents don't cost the signing club a draft pick. The Orioles will get a sandwich pick as compensation for losing Hawkins, but it doesn't cost us anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,175
|
Quote:
Here's Hawkins' K/9 rates since 2002: 7.06 8.73 7.57 6.16 7.23 6.87 4.03 He's the classic "if he isn't hurt, he's sure pitching like he is" case. By the way, the idea that Dan O'Dowd has a special skill at finding cheap and effective relievers is kind of accepted by everyone around here. I'm not so convinced. Yes, there've been a few very notable successes. Justin Speier and Brian Fuentes among them. But how about the notable failures? Here's the bullpen pickups since the post-2000 offseason. The whole list of everyone who pitched more than about 20 innings in relief, or those who were picked up to assume a relatively significant role; I'm not trying to trick you by being selective: Acquired for/during 2001 season: Kane Davis Justin Speier Ron Villone Jay Powell Juan Acevedo Dan Miceli I 2002 season: Todd Jones Justin Speier Kent Mercker Dennys Reyes Rick White Chris Nichting (actually picked up late '01) Brian Fuentes Victor Santos 2003 season: Nelson Cruz Javy Lopez Adam Bernero Steve Reed Dan Miceli, Pt. II (arrived late '02) 2004 season: Turk Wendell Vladimir Nunez Jeff Fassero Allan Simpson (looks like he washed out of Milwaukee, too ... still waiting, HF?) 2005 season: David Cortes Marcos Carvajal Mike DeJean Jose Acevedo Jay Witasick Randy Williams Blaine Neal Bobby Seay Matt Anderson Dan Miceli, Pt. III 2006 season: Jose Mesa Tom Martin Ray King Manny Corpas Ramon Ramirez Jeremy Affeldt Nate Field Mike DeJean, Pt. II Still impressed? Yes, O'Dowd has shown the ability to find guys stuck in other clubs' farm systems who then blossomed with the Rockies: Justin Speier (a waiver claim), Brian Fuentes (for Jeff Cirillo!) have been unqualified successes. Guys like Javy Lopez and (so far) Ramirez and Corpas have put in at least a few good months of work. But the "proven veteran relievers" are another story. In fact, I'd say O'Dowd has quite a horrible record in obtaining veteran relievers -- the guys who have been around as established MLB relievers for some time. Steve Reed, 3 months each of Jay Witasick and Jay Powell, and a couple Dan Miceli half seasons are the only real "finds" that I can find. And these are outweighed by the total washouts: Reyes, Wendell, Nunez, King, Fassero, Cruz, White, Mesa. And notice that the washout ratio has gotten much worse since 2003. So when O'Dowd goes out and gets that Mexican League guy like Cortes or this new guy, I say "fine." He's had some real skill in finding this cheapo guys hidden in other systems or other countries. But when you say "Latroy Hawkins for $3.5 million," I'm thinking Jose Mesa, Ray King, Turk Wendell, Vladimir Nunez, Jeff Fassero .... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 322
|
The K rate scares me too. He's also had bouts of homeritis in his past.
By the standards of this offseason, I call this a pretty decent gamble. By the standards of our needs and budget, I feel it's a more expensive gamble than we can afford to make. There's at least a decent chance (25% ?) that his K rate could rebound, the HR rate stays low, and he's a very good--if not lights out-- eighth inning guy. But balancing risks, rewards, and available talent, I have a hard time giving this move a thumbs up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 118
|
According to PurpleRow.....
Word from Ken Rosenthal has the Rockies/Cubs talking about a 3-team deal with JJ going to the Cubs for Jacque Jones and a pitcher. Jones would then be flipped to an unnamed 3rd team (my guess is it would be for a CF or another pitcher?) Here's to hoping the 3rd team falls through and we get stuck holding Jacque Jones! **sigh** Just a rumor.....so no need to breakdown this scenario.....for good reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 206
|
I've heard the pitcher would be Wuertz. (That sounds like O'dowd) However, you have to wonder, what would we get for Jones that could help?.
The NY Mets absolutely need to trade for a SP. We need a CF. That is a trade that absolutely has to happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,082
|
Another name to throw into the hopper, courtesy of Rotoworld...
The Twins have reportely discussed Juan Rincon with the Rockies and Astros. It's likely the Twins have talked about both Rincon and Jesse Crain in their conversations with Colorado about Jason Jennings. It's more difficult to see a fit with Houston, another team looking for starting pitching. Rincon for Morgan Ensberg would be a nice deal for Minnesota, but it'd hardly be a typical Terry Ryan move. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Thornton Co
Posts: 197
|
Jones plus something else wouldn't be too bad, but he's a corner outfielder and I believe Holliday/Hawpe and Baker will be much better, and Jones in CF is an ugly thought.
I don't see much of a market for Jones right now anyways, if the Cubs want Jennings they should start with Pie, and some pitching. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|