Quote:
Originally Posted by djwhokid
It is an issue of race.
When a black man is involved with a white victim it is almost always about race.
Kobe Bryant, O.J. Simpson, Michael Jackson, etc.. etc..
|
You're STILL on race?
Kerney had an incident occur at his home. The victim of the incident is alive and able to convey what happened to others. She did not implicate Kerney in the attack.
That incident had NOTHING to do with race.
Vick, on the other hand, had something happen at his house. The "abused" (the dogs) are unable to convey whether or not Vick had anything to do with their abuse. So naturally, the authorities have to investigate, and given that he is the home owner, he is one of the folks whose potential involvement has to be examined. The same as if the Kerney victim had been killed and unable to tell the authorities that Kerney didn't do it. Not only this, but there are "sources" that have tried to implicate Vick for his alleged involvement in dog fighting.
This has ZERO to do with race. Sad that someone would try to use the race card. Embarrassing to the human race, actually.
Could you explain who the "white victim" is in the instant case re Vick? Were the dogs white? Would the authorities involvement have been different if the dogs were black? Good lord. That you assume that anytime there is a black person involved in a crime (or, specifically a crime with a white victim) that it's "about race", is an implication of you, not the authorities.