Quote:
Originally Posted by Nighthawk
What she most likely means is that, as Zen notes, there were two works of such striking similarity as to reject happenstance, but there wasn't clear evidence who the cheator and who the cheatee were. The hope is that someone else saw the event and rats them out, which happens pretty frequently.
|
I think it is wrong to inject an accusation of cheating in this manner. As far as a copy from scenario, that would involve two "cheaters."
Unless the teacher left the room it was her role to observe for possible cheating during the test.
If cheating is suspected "fool me once" mode should kick in.
It's February. How could a teacher not know who was copying from whom?