Quote:
Originally Posted by nanwynnfan
Typical. No a scintilla of evidence to suggest you've even watched the hearings. We are to believe you because you say so.
|
i've watched the hearings and am providing my conclusions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nanwynnfan
Two posters here have documented that they have watched the hearings with some degree of attentiveness. You have not. Your statements are final and empty of evidential support.
|
please don't tell me what i've seen or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nanwynnfan
This is a laugher. It has typified your posts throughout the entire steroids debate, beginning with general opinion, progressing through Bonds [the felon] and now onto the relative credibility of witnesses.
|
laugher? has anyone even hinted that pettitte wasn't be a credible witness?
btw, did bonds use the clear or cream? this typifies your posts. you don't even entertain evidence against these "spartans".
Quote:
Originally Posted by nanwynnfan
Yep. I for one. Clemens has more credibility than McNamee or Waxman.
|
and that doesn't mean he's not lying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nanwynnfan
Let's move on.
KUDOS to Rep. Virginia Foxx, for having better things to do with her time, for holding Waxman's feet to the fire, and once again betraying Waxman's clock-watching, making a credibility farce of the entire hearing.
|
which has nothing to do with whether roger clemens took steroids or hgh or not.