Quote:
Originally Posted by bedir than average
Well, that and Monk basically defined that role as a wide out. Before Carter there was Monk. Carter literally wouldn't have had a position if not for Monk, except as a 3rd wideout.
Carter will get in, eventually, but there is no way a follower should get in before the leader.
|
How did you ever come to the conclusion that Carter somehows owes his career to Monk?
Monk was not the Godfather of the Receiver position, and you have got to be kidding me with the "Follower/Leader comment!
How does it matter who came first!!!!!
Carter's numbers are so ridiculously better than Monk's in just about every receiving category, and somehow just because Monk was first in line, you think that merits keeping Carter out??????????
That's laughable!!
That would be the equivalent of telling Marshall Faulk there is no way he should go in before Otis Anderson, simply because Anderson played before Faulk......How insane would that be????
I think you've lost me with the rationale!
