[hiaspire]

We all bow to your superiority, including those in the game. If only they had half the brain as some here they might be able to evaluate talent for a living someday.

The lists that include at least some subjective common sense associated with situations beyond pure numbers alone are already clearly superior as they allow for real world injuries and other critical considerations. It would be pretty unreasonable to ignore some of those things entirely.

It's great that there are so many different perspectives out there, though, and many opportunities to see a different side of a player and his possible future. Most of them have at least some balance between pure performance and other developmental issues.

Not all teams are the same either and certain players will fit into their needs and strategies more than others. Many teams lean in one direction more than another for either stats-based analysis or scouted talent, but in the end most of them also try to find some mix in their pipeline and have selected both types of players from the different perspectives. In the end, a team is probably better off not mirroring one list but collecting some of the strongest recommendations off various lists that see things a little differently for different types of players.