Nan
You are making so primary a mistake.....you have simply adopted a position to be contrary, and decided to neglect, or pretend not to understand, the obvious.
You have contributed nothing toward explaining how Barry Bonds, at age 35, could not only play much better than he did in his prime, but much better than anyone has ever played in their primes.
Everything you write....it has nothing to do with solving that problem.
Are you just not understanding what is being discussed here? You are so far off base with your comments.
|