i see alot of rationalization from you on this nan, and little recognition of the facts. we know bonds performance shot up at an advanced age, along with his muscles and facial features. we know he used clear. we know others testified that he was a user. we know that all the players who surpassed 61 either unequivocably used, or have high probability of using. you don't seem to want to discuss any of that. you seem to think it was ok regardless. that's fine. but don't then turn around and act as if it's unsubstantiated, or that it had no impact. it's laughable.
and i have no idea what the ruth reference was for.
|